The Rise (or lack thereof) of E-reading
Posted: April 12, 2012 Filed under: Technology | Tags: e-books, e-reading, technology 1 Comment
CC image - flickr - Let Ideas Compete
Pew Internet Report on the rise of e-reading – http://libraries.pewinternet.org/2012/04/04/the-rise-of-e-reading/
In February, 21% of Americans said they have read an e-book in the past year. When expanded to include other long-form content “such as magazines, journals, and news articles in digital format on an e-book reader, tablet computer, regular computer, or cell phone,” the percentage of people jumps to 43%.
The 2011 holiday season saw a spike in the number of e-readers and tablet computers sold. Will this become the new tech toy trend for the next 5-10 years? I have a feeling that tablet computers, like Apple’s iPad, will be a more popular item to own than a simple e-reader device because of their ability to do more than download books to read. But Amazon’s Kindle Fire, with the capacity to view video and listen to music, may be a better alternative for those who don’t want to spend a lot of time learning how to use an iPad, or don’t want to spend lots of money either.
Another thing to note–those who read e-books also read more in general than those who haven’t read an e-book in the past year. E-books readers have read 24 books on average per year, in all kinds of formats. People who don’t read e-books read an average of 15 books per year. The demographics of avid book reader tend toward women, whites, the well-educated, and those 65 years or older.
Looking at these demographics, I have to wonder. Are e-readers trending towards retirees? Is reading an activity that is mostly enjoyed by people with lots of free time on their hands? If you are a full-time working mother, reading is probably low down on your list of activities, just behind getting more sleep.
When people start saying that print books will soon be obsolete and everything will be read on a screen, I think of the handful of times I’ve personally read a book, whether on a computer screen or an e-reader. I didn’t enjoy it the way I enjoy reading a physical book, my eyes would strain and I would get tired quickly, my mind would inevitably wander off and my mouse would take me to Facebook or down another trail, or I would miss the feel of pages between my fingers and the ease of seeing exactly how far I had to go to get to the juicy ending. That progress bar at the bottom of the e-reader screen just doesn’t do it for me. Not to mention, the e-readers are sometimes hard to use and harder to download books onto. When it comes to print books, I only have to reach out and grab it.
Still, I will keep reading reports about e-readers and e-books. I will watch how the trends change and the new developments in technology that arise. But I will remain skeptical that e-readers and e-books will replace every single book in the entire UNIVERSE. My prediction? Give it another 500 years.
A closer look into “A Streetcar Named Desire”
Posted: March 16, 2012 Filed under: Reference | Tags: censorship, criticism, film, search Leave a comment
After catching the film “A Streetcar Named Desire” on Turner Classic Movies the other night, I was blown away by the performances and the writing. Now an American classic, I wanted to know more about the film, its background, the process of production, and anything else about the actors, the story, the director that I could discover. I especially wanted to find some criticism that could help clarify some questions I had — for example, What is really true about Blanche’s past and her dead husband? Does Stanley actually rape Blanche? Is Stella really going to leave Stanley? Why does Blanche so eagerly kiss a strange teenager but won’t kiss Mitch? I could probably formulate my own answers if I watched the movie several times more or carefully analyzed the play, but I was interested in what published critics and academics had to say.
I went on the ProQuest database and did a simple search of “A Streetcar Named Desire.” Lots of the results were review articles for recent stage adaptations, not exactly what I was looking for. I then added “AND film” to the search box, which gave me better results. The first article I read was truly eye-opening. Dowling’s “The Derailment of A Streetcar Named Desire” in Literature/Film Quarterly (1981) gave insight into the differences between the play and the film script and the role of the censorship board of the Motion Picture industry in the watering down the film’s sexual tones.
For example, a key component was left out of the story of Blanche’s previous marriage. In the play, it’s alluded to that her husband was gay and she actually walked in on him with another man. But this was completely left out of the film, with only his poetry as a single clue (and that’s not even a strong one.) This is the reason why Blanche lashed out at him and he therefore killed himself. It’s a much more well-rounded picture of the situation and of her past, something that I was missing from the film.
I also discovered that the censors wanted to completely do away with the rape scene at the climax of the story, which, thankfully, Tennessee Williams was vehemently opposed to and wrote a letter in protest of. In the play, this scene is much clearer with Stanley actually taking Blanche to his bed. The film, however, just uses the symbolic image of a shattered mirror, which was vague enough to have me wondering if the rape even happened at all.
Ultimately the producers of the film wanted to get as wide an audience as possible and therefore bent to the will of the censors who wanted to keep the public away from some of the most poignant and meaningful elements of the story for fear of the degradation of society. If I had not done a little research and read this article, I don’t think I would have found elsewhere such a detailed account of the censorship forced upon one of the greatest films in American cinema. The real tragedy of “A Streetcar Named Desire” is that it was never allowed to take its original language and intent to the silver screen.
New position
Posted: March 13, 2012 Filed under: Libraries | Tags: profession 1 CommentMy time at the University of the Sciences library and at the Welsh Road branch of the Free Library of Philadelphia has come to an end. Sad, but true.
Now I will be embarking on a new adventure as the Young Adult Reference Librarian at the Abington Township Public Library. I cannot believe my luck! I get to join one of the busiest public libraries in Montgomery County. I get to work with teens. I get to do exactly what I wanted to do when I graduated library school. My excitement cannot be contained!
It is sad, though, to leave the two part-time jobs I currently have. Yesterday, I broke the news of my leaving to an Iraqi mother who brings in her 3 boys consistently for homework help at Welsh Road. She kept saying, “What am I going to do without you? Who will help my kids? Can I come to the new library where you will be working?” I tried to assure her that they would fill my position as quickly as possible and that in the meantime, the teen assistants would still be working and could help her kids. Still, she was sad. She gave me a big hug and a kiss on the cheek before she left. It’s things like that that make me realize what an impact I’ve had working with these kids. Most of them are English Language Learners, not native to this country. I’m doing valuable work by providing them with quality homework help in a safe environment after school. Some children’s grades have even improved as a result of coming to the program. When I can see results like that, it validates all that I’ve been working for.
I plan to keep up with my blog but now within the scope of my new job at Abington.
The Power of Google
Posted: February 24, 2012 Filed under: Resources | Tags: google, reference, search, students Leave a commentI love this infographic about how to use search operators in Google to get the best results. Some of these strategies I knew about; some I didn’t. The tilde (~) and asterisk (*) are my two new favorites.
Originally posted by Hack College under a Creative Commons license.
Email reference – steps and questions
Posted: February 20, 2012 Filed under: Reference | Tags: email, reference, standards Leave a comment
Creative Commons image - By RambergMediaImages - flickr.com
What’s the best way to answer a reference question by email?
Luckily I was well prepared to do this today because of my previous experience answering reference questions submitted through the Internet Public Library website as part of my virtual reference class. Here’s the formula I followed:
- Greeting – Say hello and use the person’s name if you know it. Makes the transaction more personal.
- Reiterate the question being asked
- Give an answer – Use simple steps, URL links, screen capture images, anything else to make the patron’s job easier to find the information they are looking for.
- Describe how you found the answer – This is your change to have a teaching moment and show the patron how they could find the answer next time on their own. You’d be surprised how grateful people are when you go this extra mile.
- Provide follow-up help – Let the patron know that they can always come back for more help if they have any questions or if the answer wasn’t quite what they were looking for. Give contact information, again to make it easier for the patron.
- Say goodbye – It’s nice to give a goodbye greeting to make the email transaction more personal.
I came away with some questions after answering my first email at the USciences reference desk. We discussed many of these ideas in my virtual reference class but I am still trying to find satisfying answers.
- How much information is TOO much information for an answer? At what point will the patron stop reading your email answer? When it is too long? Filled with too much jargon? Not formatted in a readable way?
- Can this question even be answered properly through email? Or do you need to suggest a phone/in-person meeting to discuss the answer/information need? What’s the best way to go about that?
- How can you tell if the patron is asking for what they really need? Reference librarians know that most patrons don’t ask for what they want right away. You have to ask them questions to get to the root of their need. With email, it’s hard to ask the patron for clarification, especially when the patron may never respond back.
Librarians – what kinds of concerns/questions do you have about email reference?
First Reference Transaction!
Posted: February 10, 2012 Filed under: Reference | Tags: reference, search Leave a commentAfter starting my first shift ever at the reference desk at J.W. England Library, University of the Sciences, I got a reference question in the first 5 minutes. That was fast!
Her initial question was about if we had access to an article. After some back and forth, we determined that article wasn’t exactly what her professor was looking for. It was a news article and not a scholarly journal article. So her initial question turned into a different problem that we needed to solve.
Now she needed to go back into the CINAHL and the Cochrane Databases but she had received very little results from her first search or results that weren’t relelvant. Her problem was that she was using very specific keywords, which worked for some databases but not so great for others, and didn’t revise her search strategy when the results were poor.
I showed her several ways she could expand her search–by using synonyms and wildcards, looking at subject headings of relevant articles, and limiting her results by date or subject.
She left the desk satisfied. It was my first official success at the reference desk as a newly-minted librarian!
Go me!
What an old atlas taught me
Posted: January 31, 2012 Filed under: Resources | Tags: history, maps Leave a comment
Going through my grandparents’ house, I found an old atlas from 1941. What a treasure! This was a volatile time for Europe and the maps clearly show it. Half of France and all of Belgium were shaded with the “occupied by Germany” color.
My boyfriend and I spent a lot of time last night pouring over the maps. To think in about 30 years, that atlas will be 100 years old. I would like to keep it in good condition, so I will have to research the best way to store it.
On the map of Europe, we were particularly interested in how the Eastern European nations differed from today. I mentioned Prague and the Czech Republic, but we couldn’t find the city. We weren’t even sure where on the map exactly the Czech Republic would be today. So I looked it up on the Internet, along with the history of the country. I had no idea about the Czech’s stormy past, being ruled by the Hapsburg Empire for 300 years, then forming an independent country only to be taken by Hitler, dealing with the Soviet Invasion, and finally pushing its way through the Velvet Revolution.
Looking at an old atlas really showed me how much I still have to learn about this world.
What Google’s search filters could mean for the future of creative thinking
Posted: January 30, 2012 Filed under: News | Tags: google, internet, search Leave a commentIn The Filter Bubble, author Eli Pariser presents various reasons why Internet personalization filters are bad for us. The part that I’ve been most interested in is how these “filter bubbles” affect our ability to think creatively.
As an undergrad working on my English thesis, I had an a-ha moment when I was developing my topic. I was pulling information not just from my knowledge of literature and writing, but going a step further to connect this with facts and ideas from other disciplines, such as psychology, sociology, and science. My brain was connecting all kinds of dots to create a bigger, more fully realized picture. Because I had taken a variety of courses and exposed myself to topics outside of my usual comfort zone, I had access to broader resources which made my thesis more interesting and, I think, more accessible to those outside of the English department.
A major reason for this process and outcome was a result of my ability to think creatively and “outside the box.” And yet, this is precisely what Pariser believes will deteriorate with the increasing popularity of personalization filters on the Internet. These filters find out who we are and what we like, think, and believe and then proceed to give us more of the same. It severely limits our exposure to news, facts, and ideas that we otherwise may not see or hear about. Pariser explains that “ingenuity comes from the juxtaposition of ideas that are far apart” (p. 93). When we are no longer seeing ideas from other disciplines, opinions, and modes of thinking because of a filter bubble, we lose our ingenuity and our access to the innovative mind. Serendipity is deleted from the equation.
As a librarian and Millenial, I have grown up with this paradigm shift — from getting information from books, newspapers, radio, and television, to the Internet being the sole information source for some, if not most, people. I still read books and newspapers. I listen to the radio to catch up on the news. Yet, I’m beginning to see how the filter bubble is affecting younger generations. As an after school leader of a library drop-in homework help program, I try to refer kids to print media first but so many of them say that they would prefer to go on the Internet to look up a fact or answer a few homework questions. They would rather wait a half hour or longer for a computer to open up instead of taking 5 minutes to look through a book. Print media is serendipidous in the way it is organized. This younger generation is missing out on the chance to be surprised and amazed by things they don’t know yet. By flipping through an encyclopedia, dictionary, atlas, or any non-fiction book, kids explore information in a way that the Internet and search engines are not suited for. Children are seeing less and less of the bigger picture and therefore will be impaired later in life when creative and critical thinking skills are highly valued.
Librarians should be aware of the filter bubble and find ways to measure and combat its deleterious effects on our intellectual culture.
Lindsay Cummings 